Fairfax Lawyers crusade for Virginia's Segregated laws.

Robert Machen and his partner Stephen Armstrong may not be wearing the Klu Klux Klan's costumes while representing their clients at the Fairfax County Circuit Court, But their action speaks louder than appearances, and their racist slurs brings back painful bygone memories of Virginia Segregationist past.

Machen calls me a "sand nigger who doesn't deserve the protection of America" says Ron Jagannathan a Systems Engineer of Indian origin who works for the Department of Defense at the Pentagon.

Machen wears a suite and walks into the courtroom as a lawyer. A staunch supporter of Storm Thurmond who ran for presidency in 1948 under the segregationist banner, Machen had stated, If the people elected Strom for Presidency instead of Harry Truman, We would not be having this issue of dealing with racial integration.

Robert Machen had stated that he would work for free to prevent the mongrelization of races in Virginia. Interracial marriages are the most unstable of all marriages. Interracial marriages are a disgrace culturally, racially, and are debilitating to the country. True to his word, over the past two decades he and his partner have worked pro bono ensuring that interracial couples are separated bitterly with as much acrimony as possible.

Their latest crusade case spans over five years and several volumes of litigation documents that many say can be considered racketeering and barratry at tax payer's expenses. – A crime under current Virginia laws. Their latest victims are two young children caught in the cross fire - the tiniest victims of an interracial union.

Machen and Armstrong say -- they are just providing free legal service to a poor woman who is being manipulated by a clever ex-husband who has abused her and her children. Ron has refused to pay his child support. He is a danger to my client and her children as well as to himself. He is mentally unstable and a psychopath.

Our client is unable to face him in the court or at visitation exchanges. That's why she has to be protected.

Ron Jagannathan says that as far back as 2002, he has filed countless papers with the courts with proof of the lawyers racist agenda. He says that his wife has lived under the Soviet regime, and is totally isolated under Machen and Armstrong's influence here in the U.S. These two lawyers are emotionally, mentally and psychologically battering and abusing my ex-wife into submission. Adding to that factor, she is paranoid delusional and is easily susceptible to manipulations.
These lawyers are no saints representing a poor client. They are totally misrepresenting their client using her as a surrogate to persecute me says Ron.

She is not the perpetrator here. I have nothing against my former wife, and would like to help her end this litigation and to bring the two lawyers to justice so that we may both work together parenting our children.

The FBI had refused to act – Unless Valeria walks into their office and swears out a testimony regarding the abuses; Then they may be able to prosecute Machen.

I guarantee this racketeering litigation will end within a week if the two lawyers are kicked out of the equation by the Fairfax Judges. I have been pleading with the Judges to do just that. Wouldn't that be in the best interest of my children? Says Ron. Look – Their previous clients, Ms. Arlene Harmes had sued Mchen for misrepresenting her interests, Another client – Ms.Yvette Davis had complained of being sexually abused by Machen and Armstrong and had turned around and sued them in the court, a third client had committed suicide while being represented by Machen. The Women's shelter where Machen and Armstrong recruited Valeria had banned them from approaching any of their clients after some of them complained of being sexually harassed. There is something very bad going on here.

U.S Senator John Warner's office had recognized the problem and has called for a FBI investigation into the case. In a letter to U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Senator Warner had requested that the Justice Department intervene and investigate the complaints.

A criminal background investigation for Machen reveals that his law license had been previously suspended by the Virginia State Bar for deceit and fraud. Machen has been convicted by Honorable Judge Albert V. Bryan, in the United States District Court of Virginia, Alexandria Division,

U.S Attorneys had prosecuted him for obstruction of justice and Document fraud for which he had received three felony convictions and a year in jail.
In a past complaint, Three Judges appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Honorable Judge Thomas D. Thorne, Judge Dickson L.Foster, Judge Robert K. Woltz had found by clear and convincing evidence that Machen had engaged in conduct for personal advantage, involving deceit that reflects adversely on his fitness to practice law and found him guilty under DR1-102(A)(4) of code of professional responsibility.

The Organization - Citizen for Legal Reform reports Machen has engaged in numerous conduct which tends to undermine the administration of justice and brings legal businesses into disrepute.

Recently, two Loudoun county Circuit court Judges had refused to preside over a
case in which Robert Machen was a party. A Loudoun county prosecutor had refered to him as a "douche bag" lawyer.

Armstrong had been representing Machen in each of his disciplinary proceedings before the court.

Ron frustrated by a lack of action by the Fairfax Circuit court had approached the U.S Justice department. In his letter to the U.S Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Ron outlined Machen's violations of several state and federal statutes in his representations which prompted U.S Senator John Warner to ask for a federal investigation.

This has been a very frustrating experience. I can't believe these lawyers are still allowed to practe law says a lawyer on conditions of anonymity. He has had three felony convictions. It is unbelievable the State courts have been silent over this says a friend. This is not the sixties!

In June of 1958, two residents of Virginia, Richard Loving, a white man and Mildred Jeter, a colored woman were married in the District of Columbia pursuant to its laws.

Shortly thereafter returning to Virginia, where upon their plea of guilty, they were sentenced, in a Virginia state court, to one year in jail. for violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages. October of 1958 a Virginia grand jury issued an indictment charging the Lovings with violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in jail.

Their motion to vacate the sentences on the ground of the unconstitutionality of these statutes was denied by the trial court. The Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed."Leaving State to evade law. -- If any white person and colored person shall go out of this State, for the purpose of being married, and with the intention of returning, and be married out of it, and afterwards return to and reside in it, cohabiting as man and wife, they shall be punished as provided in § 20-59, and the marriage shall be governed by the same law as if it had been solemnized in this State. The fact of their cohabitation here as man and wife shall be evidence of their marriage."Section 20-59, which defines the penalty for miscegenation, provides:"Punishment for marriage. -- If any white person intermarry with a colored person, or any colored person intermarry with a white person, he shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by confinement in the penitentiary for not less than one nor more than five years."Forty years later, in June of 1998, two residents of Virginia, Ron Jagannathan an Indian man and Valeria Jagannathan a white woman were married in Novosibirsk Siberia and returned to Virginia. They did not face any harassment from the State and went on to live in Reston, Virginia creating a family. In a series of events that lead to Valeria being estranged from Ron and ending up in a shelter. Robert Machen secreting his client at a shelter filed a divorce even without consulting his client. Using his client as a surrogate,-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://liamsdad.org/hall_of_shame/machen/petition_prosecutional_enquiry.pdf Petition for a prosecutional enquiry. http://whitecollarchildabuse.com/ &

http://www.petitiononline.com/faxva01/petition.html http://liamsdad.org/hall_of_shame/machen.shtml

Robert Machenhttp://liamsdad.org/others/machen_letter.shtml http://www.safe4all.org/forums/message-view?message_id=31905 Robert Machen has been accused of sexually harrassing women at the shelter.
http://liamsdad.org/others/sveta_lisa.shtml White collar child abuse against little Sveta and Lisa.
http://www.vsb.org/attorney/searchResults.asp?firstname=&lastname=machen&search=D&type=D&submit=Search Machen disciplined by the Bar Association.http://liamsdad.org/others/ron_fbi.pdf Letter from the FBI to Senator John Warner.We seek your support in bringing forward to the Fairfax County on a white collar child abusing lawyer abusing two little children from Westlawn Elementary school. Their father is fighting a brave marathon battle the last five years to stop the white collar child abuse.

Segregated laws in Virginia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segregation_academies

Jim Crow laws in Virginia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Crow_laws

See: Judge Gaylord Finch Jr - How this incompetent Judge and a friend of Robert Machen along with Janine Saxe ( Now a Judge in Fairfax) conspired to defraud two children and their parents. http://framedfathers.blogspot.com/2009/01/many-complaints-about-virginia-judge.html

Fairfax Judge Gaylord Finch under Fire

http://www.liamsdad.org/others/sveta_lisa.shtml

http://www.liamsdad.org/hall_of_shame/gay_finch.shtml ( Kangaroo Court Judges)

Gaylord Finch under Fire

http://finchunderfire-virginia.blogspot.com/2009/01/breaking-news-gaylord-finch-fairfax.html

Did Fairfax Judge Gaylord Finch conspire with Fairfax Bar President and GAL Janine Saxe and twice federally convicted Lawyer Robert Machen to fix cases? Read and Judge ( below)

Several People have reported complaints about Robert Machen:

Robert Machen was convicted of "Obstruction Of Justice", "misleading conduct with intent to alter records", and "Engage in misleading conduct w/intent to influence testimony by preventing the communication to a law enforcement officer" in Federal Court (01/08/1988). Here is the index to the court case.

Robert Machen was sentenced to one year in jail and fined $10,000. Check out his Rap Sheet.
He has been disciplined by the Virginia Bar Association, even had his license Suspended due to his criminal record (02/02/1988).One must really question why the Bar Association ever let Machen practice law again.

In 1993 Robert Machen was convicted again - this time of engaging in "conduct for personal advantage, involving deceit that reflects adversely on his fitness to practice law." He was officially reprimanded.

In 2001 Attorney Machen was once again reprimanded by the Virginia Bar Association. Its ironic that his appeal of his reprimand was denied because he failed to file a timely transcript. In other words he lost his appeal due to his incompetence as an attorney in representing himself.

He has been accused of sexually harassing women at Bethany House a women's shelter.
Petition for Prosecutorial inquiry
He has been committing White Collar Child Abuse
He has been harassing Ron Jagannathan, read affidavit and motion.
Letter about Robert Machen to Graham Road United Methodist Church
Letter about Robert Machen to Colonel Richard Pregent
Letter from the Virginia Attorney General
Letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Senator Warner
Letter from the FBI to Senator Warner
He hasn't even bothered to get malpractice insurance

Janine Saxe was involved in a $ 65,000.00 money racket with Robert Machen and Judge Gaylord Finch in defrauding litigant.

To: The Honorable Attorney General John D. Ashcroft. The Honorable Governor Mark Warner. The Honorable Judges of Fairfax County, Virginia. The Honorable Senators, Congressmen, Legislators, Children's rights organizations. Fairfax County Supervisors, Church Groups, Family rights activists, Residents of Fairfax County and Virginia.
We need your help and support.

Two innocent little children (Sveta "5 Years" and Lisa "3 years") have been the tiniest victims of these two attorneys manipulations the last two and a half years.

Friends of Little Sveta and Lisa would like to bring awareness and help end this abuse by Mr. Robert B. Machen and Ms. Janine M. Saxe ( guardian ad litem for the children).

Ms. Janine Saxe and Mr. Robert Machen are wasting Tens of Thousands of tax payer dollars undermining fit parents, misleading and abusing our court system, setting one parent against the other, false reporting to courts, state and federal agencies, separating and abusing the Jagannathan family while profiting unethically from their actions.

This is unacceptable, and should not be tolerated here in the U.S or anywhere else in the world.

Little Sveta and Lisa have been subjected to suffering and their young minds abused and manipulated by the destructive actions of Ms. Janine Saxe and Mr. Robert Machen.

We demand Ms. Saxe and Mr. Machen be removed from the lives of little Sveta and Lisa.

We demand Ms. Saxe and Mr. Machen be held accountable, brought to justice, and punished. We demand an independent investigation.

We request wide dissemination of this material. Thank you for signing this petition.

Whereas, Ms. Janine M. Saxe and Mr. Robert B. Machen's malicious acts are an act of emotional and psychological terrorism against the little children, against parents and against a family;

Whereas, for Children and Parents there can be nothing in life experience more devastating than the abrupt, brutal, and unwarranted enforced separation due to the abusive and manipulative tactics of Ms. Saxe and Mr. Machen;

Whereas, The parent-child bond is the strongest instinct, superseding all else and is protected by our constitutional rights;

Whereas, Ms. Saxe was made aware of Attorney Robert Machens' past record of malpractice including, falsifying documents and evidence;

Whereas, The Virginia State Bar had disciplined Mr. Machen, reprimanding him twice and suspending his license for falsifying documents. He has had district committee sanctions leveled against him.

Three Judges appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Honorable Judge Thomas D. Thorne, Judge Dickson L. Foster, Judge Robert K. Woltz had found by clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Machen engaged in conduct for personal advantage, involving deceit that reflects adversely on his fitness to practice law and found him guilty under DR1-102(A)(4) of code of professional responsibility.

The Organization - Citizen for Legal Reform reports Mr. Machen has engaged in conduct which tends to undermine the administration of justice and to bring legal businesses into disrepute;
Whereas, Ms. Saxe was made aware of Rule 3.4 of the Virginia State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys.

Whereas the FBI and the U.S attorney's office charged Robert Machen with obstruction of justice and altering records and Jailed him in a federal prison for One year.

Whereas Janine Saxe believes that a lawyer (Robert Machen) who has served his time should not be judged by his past crimes.

A Lawyer shall not Falsify Evidence. Counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely;

Whereas, Ms. Janine Saxe failed to abide by the Virginia State Bar code when she violated Rule 8.4 Rules of Professional conduct (A Lawyer's obligation to report misconduct to disciplinary authorities is absolute, and is stronger than the policy against disclosing confidential material surrendered during discovery. Therefore a Lawyer who suspects unethical conduct by another lawyer can include information uncovered during this litigation in an unsealed counterclaim, despite the protective order protecting the material);

Whereas, Attorney Mr. Machen repeatedly filed false papers and made false statements in court that were not supported by evidence, and Ms. Saxe as an attorney and officer of the court is duty bound by law to report such falsifications;

Whereas, white collar child and family abuse by Ms. Saxe and Mr. Machen with no regard or thought to the emotional impact on two little Children (Sveta and Lisa) who have suffered endlessly by the actions of these two attorneys is a violation of the rights or parents guaranteed by the U.S Constitution and the Commonwealth of Virginia;

Whereas, Ms. Saxe and Mr. Machen have abused and undermined the children's interests, the justice system at the expense of the taxpayers, and the Jagannathan's family assets for over two years with deceit and malpractice, while profiting from these abuses by asking for attorney fees and other expenses;

Whereas, to have a parent child bond abruptly severed by the malicious efforts of Ms. Saxe and Mr. Machen giving no consideration to the fear, anxiety, and trauma their actions cause to two little children, is child abuse, a crime against humanity and should not be tolerated in the state of Virginia;

Whereas, Ms. Janine Saxe interests in being a guardian, of the children while advocating denial of visitation to the fit, educated and caring father of Sveta and Lisa;

Whereas, small children believe their parents to be all-powerful, like super heroes. They believe that their parents possess an all-powerful ability to shelter and protect them from any threat;

Whereas, Ms. Saxe and Mr. Machen coercion of a parent into submission under a false pretense and engineering the abduction of their children from all that is safe and familiar to them, a fundamental belief system within the child is broken forever, along with the child's ability to feel safe and secure in their world;

Whereas, Robert Machen attempts to file numerous injective relief, Protective orders in order to separate the parents and the children claiming a new set of abuse allegation each time;

Whereas, spurious child abuse charges maliciously filed with Child Protective Services (CPS) were dismissed as baseless by the CPS, yet Mr. Machen goes to court with a motion the very next week on child abuse and neglect charges;

Whereas, a fax document discovered as evidence of Robert Machens' devious actions in which he conspires to bring criminal false allegation to the FBI, Department of Justice, and the Immigration and Naturalization Service in order to revoke the father of the children's green card in an effort to seize control of the children;

We deplore Ms. Janine M. Saxe and Mr. Robert B. Machen's relentless two and a half year effort at undermining the children's interests, promoting separation, bitterness, acrimony and divorce between the parents by playing one side against the other, filing false documents with Federal and State Agencies including the FBI, Department of Justice, Child Protective Services, Police, The former Immigration and Naturalization Service. NOW THEREFORE,

BE IT RESOLVED that the rights of parent and children to have frequent and continuing contact is a fundamental, joint right of the parent and child with a basis in constitutional case law, which has held that the rights to raise, have access to, and care for one's own children are "more precious than property rights," are "essential"; and that the right to be with one's children is a" natural" right with a higher moral claim than any economic right.

BE IT RESOLVED that the U.S Supreme court has stated consistently as that of parental rights. Ie: In 1923 the Court asserted that the "liberty" protected by the Due Process Clause includes the right of parents to "establish a home and bring up children" and to "control the education of their own." Meyer v. Nebraska. 262 U.S 390, 399, 401, (1923). On June 5, 2000, the Supreme Court declared that

It cannot now be doubted that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children. Troxel v. Granville ( 530 U.S 2000)

BE IT RESOLVED that Fundamental Constitutional rights are accorded a special status in judicial review. The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the state from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."

BE IT RESOLVED that the actions of Ms. Janine Saxe and Mr. Robert Machen are a infringement of parental rights guaranteed under our constitution. Such acts of deprivation must occur only when there is a compelling state interest served by interfering with these rights and there is no more constitutionally benign way to achieve this compelling state interest.

BE IT RESOLVED that there has never been any evidence presented that, the retention of parental rights by both parents would compromise a compelling state interest.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that We assert and affirm our rights under the constitution to protect and defend our children from the likes of Janine M. Saxe and Robert B. Machen.
Thank you for taking the time to read and sign this petition.

Friends of Sveta and Lisa

Walter Johnson
Email: wjohnsonva@lycos.com

---------------------------------------------------------

Walter,

Harry Saxe would turn in his grave if he reads this post. He died in Charlston this September.

I guess you can never know a person by his/her family.

Harry C. Saxe of Charleston died on September 4, 2010, at the age of 90 years.

Dr. Saxe was born on March 18, 1920, in Long Island City, New York, the son of Charles Lawrence Saxe and Alice McGrath. A distinguished veteran of World War II,

Dr. Saxe served his country proudly from 1942 to 1948 as a lieutenant with the US Army Corps of Engineers in the North African, Mediterranean and European Theatres of Operation. He was the recipient of seven bronze stars and a bronze arrowhead.

For fifty years, Dr. Saxe engaged in higher education serving as both a professor and as an administrator. His years of teaching included positions at Georgia Institute of Technology, University of Cincinnati, University of Notre Dame, University of Louisville and The Citadel.

He served as Acting Dean of the College of Engineering at Notre Dame and Dean of the Speed Scientific School at the University of Louisville. Dr. Saxe was the Louis S. LeTellier Distinguished Visiting Professor and an adjunct professor at The Citadel. He held a B.C.E. degree in Civil Engineering from the City College of New York; an M.S.E. in Civil Engineering from the University of Florida and a Sc.D in Civil Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

During his distinguished career, Dr. Saxe received numerous honors and awards, among them the University of Notre Dame Special Service Award, the National Science Foundation Faculty Fellow Award, the American Society of Civil Engineers Carolina Section Lifetime Award for Professional Achievement and the Algernon Sydney Sullivan Award for his exemplary character and service from The Citadel.

Dr. Saxe is survived by his loving wife, Mary; two daughters, Janine Saxe (Alan R. Sager) and Coreen (Ricardo) Urbina; three step-daughters, Molly Craft, Amy Craft and Linda (James) Coe; ten grandchildren and one great-grandchild. Donations in memory of Harry Charles Saxe may be made to Programs & Awards,

The Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi, 7576 Goodwood Blvd., Baton Rouge, LA, 70806 or to the American Society of Civil Engineers Foundation, 1801 Alexander Bell Dr., Reston, VA, 20191. The Saxe family is being served by McAlister-Smith, Mt Pleasant Chapel.

Judge Gaylord Finch and the Pitchfork Rebellion

Pitchfork rebellion against Judge Finch

01/14/09 12:05 AM EST

A lot of Virginians are coming out of the woodwork and demanding that the General Assembly refuse to reappoint Fairfax Circuit Court Judge Gaylord Finch. The complaints are coming close to critical mass.

Virginia and South Carolina are the only two states in which legislators appoint judges. Partisan fighting between the Republican-controlled House and Democratic-controlled state Senate delayed many nominations last session. But Virginia lawmakers also have the power to deny a judge reappointment if he/she fails to live up to expectations.

A bill submitted by former delegate and current state attorney general Robert McDonnell created a panel to review judges’ performance of circuit, general district, and juvenile and domestic relations judges. It went into effect for the first time this year. Legislators are supposed to rate judges by their record on the bench instead of just rubber-stamping them for another term.

And they’re getting an earful from irate defendants who feel their rights were violated by Judge Finch. One man claims Judge Finch refused to enter a final order in his case – for four years !– leaving him in a legal no-man’s-land. Another reportedly told the FBI that Finch routinely hears criminal cases in which the defense attorney is his golfing buddy and a frequent houseguest.

A former Fairfax County resident told members of the Courts of Justice Committee that Finch ridiculed and mocked her when she appeared pro se in his courtroom in an attempt to regain custody of her young daughter. Another man complained that in 2005, Judge Finch systematically denied him his constitutional rights when he was charged with trespassing for attending a school party for his Down’s syndrome son at this ex-wife’s invitation. He claims that Judge Finch refused to rule on his motions to dismiss, wouldn’t let the proceedings be recorded by the court reporter present, or even let the defendant present evidence or rebut witnesses.

Finch is also accused of holding ex parte hearings on a custody and child support case and ordering the wrongful imprisonment of a man on false child abuse charges that were later overturned. And the Fairfax County Coalition of Advocates for Public Schools blasted Judge Finch’s handling of the controversial western boundary redistricting case.

Any one of these complaints should give legislators pause as they reconsider reappointing Judge Finch. Taken together, however, they paint such a disturbing picture of judicial arrogance and disdain for the constitutional rights of citizens as to render him unfit for the bench.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/SharpSticks/Pitchfork_rebellion_against_Judge_Finch-011409.html#ixzz14c23xTuI

"The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated." - Thomas Jefferson

"Power is the great evil with which we are contending. We have divided power between three branches of government and erected checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. However, where is the check on the power of the judiciary? If we fail to check the power of the judiciary, I predict that we will eventually live under judicial tyranny." - Patrick Henry

"If you see injustice and say nothing, you have taken the side of the oppressor." - Desmund Tutu.

"The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." - John Stuart Mill

Janine Saxe - White Collar Child Abuser.

Janine Saxe - Fairfax County JDR Judge : A White Collar Child Abuser ATTENTION Fairfax County Residents, FATHERS AND MOTHERS, Grand Parents too. For Many years, Janine Saxe has been known to Parents and Grand Parents in Northern Virginia simply as a White Collar Child Abuser • Janine Saxe has been known to create unnecessary litigation between parents, stretch out child custody litigation, run up her bills. • Janine Saxe has been hostile to fit fathers seeking shared custody. • Janine Saxe has been known to separate fit parents and children through false and fabricated testimony in court. • Janine Saxe abuses Virginia’s foster care system. • Janine Saxe is an unethical Divorce Lawyer. Do you want this unethical person to be a Judge? JANINE SAXE MUST NOT be elected as a Fairfax County Juvenile & Domestic Relations Court JUDGE Janine Saxe is Bad for Children, Bad for Parents, Bad for Tax payers of Virginia SAY NO to Janine Saxe ASK Virginia Delegates NOT to elect Lawyer Janine Saxe on January 4th 2005 Judicial Nominations. VIRINIA’s Children come first NOT Lawyers. CHILDREN HAVE A RIGHT TO EQUAL TIME WITH BOTH PARENTS!! This is Robert Machen's Prison Record - Janine Saxe was aware of this document. ( See Above) Flyer for distribution - Janine Saxe is bad for children Robert Machen's Federal Prison record Robert Machen's Index to his Criminal Trial Robert Machen and Stephen Armstrong - Racist bigots who Janine Saxe knew and condoned. Robert Machen accused of sexually harassing women or Link Here Petition against Janine Saxe at Fathers wiki

Janine Saxe's favorate Judge who was used by her and Robert Machen to abuse the kids

5 Children Stolen by CPS in Virginia


Mom speaks to Cass County Mi/ corrupt Family court & DHS #1

WARNING! NOTHING ON THIS SITE IS MEANT TO BE LEGAL ADVICE! You should do your homework, calm down, assess the situation, then and only then hire a competent attorney to represent you. GWINNETT COUNTY DOES NOT LIKE PRO-SE LITIGANTS!

The Goal of this website is to Reduce litigation, Increase mediation , Eliminate the Guardian Ad Litem from private custody cases and Help facilitate workable joint physical and legal custody arrangements so the child may benefit from the love, direction and decision making capabilities of both parents.

In Atlanta Firing or Removing your G.A.L. may require the following steps:

1. File a motion opposing the appointment of a GAL

2. File motion to appoint psychologist if needed

3. File a motion to withdraw your counterclaim for custody

4. Amend your ANSWER to the Plaintiff's complaint denying a change occurred

5. File Summary Judgment or Contempt for failure to mediate or make good faith effort to resolve issues

6. File a motion to require 10 hours of mediation before a GAL may be appointed

You should know that the only reason the Court has appointed a GAL is that you and your ex can not agree on the who should have custody of your child. This gives the SYSTEM THIEVES a perfect excuse to bilk you and your ex out of thousands. The GAL is only interested in escalating her fees and does not care what your child wants. The only way to get rid of this parasite is to remove the disagreement between the parties.

This might mean that you have to drop your counterclaim. The Court does not like to change custody unless a material change in circumstances adversely affecting the welfare of the child can be demonstrated. If you and your Ex both agree that a change has occurred then it becomes a simple matter of appointing a GAL to determine the "best interest of the child". If you drop your counterclaim and amend your answer to show that no change has occurred or that the other parent refused to work with you in good faith to resolve the issue you have a great chance of retaining custody because the burden of proving a change occurred is on the Plaintiff.

If a real change has taken place and you want more visitation or custody the other parent should make a good faith effort to resolve your issues before a GAL is appointed. If you are the Plaintiff and a GAL has been appointed and the Judge will not vacate the order to appoint simply withdraw your complaint without prejudice. You can then schedule and attend mediation without paying the $200 per hour to the GAL. Why pay the mediator $200 per hour and the GAL $200 per hour?