Edwin Schuster admitted there are CPS workers who act inappropriately or make mistakes and need to be better informed.
CPS Abuses in Fairfax have increased with over the past few years. All it takes is an unethical Social worker who fabricates Child Abuse charges usually against Fathers in Divorce and Child Custody situations.
BRISTOW, Okla. (AP) — A former judge convicted of exposing himself while presiding over jury trials by using a sexual device under his robe was sentenced Friday to four years in prison.
Donald Thompson had spent almost 23 years on the bench and had served as a state legislator before retiring from the court in 2004. He showed no reaction when he was sentenced.
At his trial this summer, his former court reporter, Lisa Foster, testified that she saw Thompson expose himself at least 15 times during trial between 2001 and 2003. Prosecutors said he also used a device known as a penis pump during at least four trials in the same period.
Thompson, 59, was convicted last month of four felony courts of indecent exposure for incidents that took place in his Creek County courtroom.
Thompson, a married father of three grown children, testified that the penis pump was given to him as a joke by a longtime hunting and fishing buddy.
"It wasn't something I was hiding," he said.
He said he may have absentmindedly squeezed the pump's handle during court cases but never used it to masturbate.
Foster told authorities that she saw Thompson use the device almost daily during the August 2003 murder trial of a man accused of shaking a toddler to death. A whooshing sound could be heard on Foster's audiotape of the trial. When jurors asked the judge about the sound, Thompson said he hadn't heard it but would listen for it.
Police built a case against the judge after a police officer testifying in a 2003 murder trial saw a piece of plastic tubing disappear under Thompson's robe. During a lunch break, officers took photographs of the pump under the desk.
Investigators later checked the carpet, Thompson's robes and the chair behind the bench and found semen, according to court records.
Carmelia Brossett, a senior probation officer for the state Department of Corrections, said in a presentencing report that Thompson refused to undergo psychosexual testing.
"Thompson's denial of the offense would likely present difficulty, if not inability for treatment providers to provide meaningful and beneficial sex-offender treatment," she said.
The jury recommended a sentence of one year in prison and a $10,000 fine on each count. The jury foreman has said it was the jury's intent that Thompson serve the full sentence.
Judge C. Allen McCall denied a defense motion asking that Thompson be allowed to remain free pending an appeal. Thompson was also ordered to pay a $40,000 fine.
Beth Phillips, United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, announced today that a respiratory therapist who sometimes worked in the pediatric unit at Kansas University Medical Center has been charged in federal court with producing child pornography and attempting to distribute child pornography over the Internet.
Michael D. Toal, 55, of Kansas City, Mo., was charged in a criminal complaint filed on Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2010, in the U.S. District Court in Kansas City. Toal had his initial court appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays this afternoon and remains in federal custody pending a detention hearing on Monday, March 1, 2010.
The federal criminal complaint alleges that Toal used a minor to produce child pornography on Aug. 2, 2009. According to an affidavit filed in support of the complaint, Toal told FBI agents that he sexually abused an 8-year-old child who was in his care at his house. While the victim was asleep, the affidavit says, Toal took sexually explicit photographs of the child with his digital camera and then loaded them onto his computer.
The federal complaint also charges Toal with attempting to distribute child pornography over the Internet on Aug. 10, 2009. According to the affidavit, an agent at the FBI’s Denver, Col., division conducted an investigation using peer-to-peer file-sharing software and downloaded images of child pornography that were available to be shared from Toal’s computer, which was using a similar software program.
Law enforcement officers interviewed Toal at his home earlier this month and seized his computer, which as later investigation revealed, contained a large quantity of child pornography, the affidavit says.
The government filed a motion today to keep Toal in federal custody without bond, alleging that he is a danger to the community. According to the motion for detention, Toal told agents that he inappropriately touched at least one child patient while working as a respiratory therapist. Toal has increased his access to children who are vulnerable, the motion says, by becoming a volunteer with Jackson County’s CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocate) program for abused and neglected children who are in the care and custody of the state.
The motion for detention also alleges that, because Toal faces a lengthy prison sentence if convicted, he is a flight risk. Under federal statutes, a conviction for producing child pornography carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years in federal prison without parole, up to a sentence of 30 years in federal prison without parole.
Phillips cautioned that the charges contained in this complaint are simply accusations, and not evidence of guilt. Evidence supporting the charges must be presented to a federal trial jury, whose duty is to determine guilt or innocence.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Katharine Fincham. It was investigated by task force officers with the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Project Safe Childhood
This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov.
LightHorse Healthcare, Inc.
2060 Dan Proctor Drive
Suite 3300
P.O. Box 5250
St Marys, GA 31558
phone: (912) 882-3800
fax: (912) 882-3303
LightHorse Healthcare, Inc.
1712 Osborne Road
St. Marys GA 31558
912-882-3800
In 2006, Ricardo Villalobos concocted a bizzare child sexual abuse story designed to further his career at the expense of two innocent children by filing a bogus CPS complaint that he knew was false claiming that the two little girls he was treating needed his theraphy for abuse inflicted upon them by their father. The mother of the two children was being manipulated into seeking Mr. Villalobos's therapy through her attorney ( convicted in a Federal Court for 3 counts of felony acts and jailed for a year) the mother a delusional woman who thought that the child's father was a International Espionage agent and who was wanted by the United States and the Soviet Union for multiple accounts of International Arms and Espionage and Computer Security breach crimes.
Villalobos saw no problem with that..and convinced the mother that the children are being abused by the father.
Over the course of a year, Villalobos continuously attempted to program the children to despise their father. While advocating that the children be kept away from their father.
+Several people have questioned Mr. Ricardo Villalobos and his credibility as to his intentions as a therapist.
+In 2008, Honorable Judge Charles Maxfield of the Fairfax Circuit Court issued an court order preventing Ricardo Villalobos from having any further contact with two young children he was providing therapy on a bi-weekly basis for over a year while claiming that the children were depressed and confused due to sexual and physical abuse inflicted by their father that he had diagnosed.
+In 2007 Honorable Judge Leslie Alden of Fairfax Circuit found Ricardo Villalobos's expert testimony lacking any credibility whatsoever.
+Mr. Villalobos came to court to testify as a expert witness on child abuse - when asked if he had brought his credentials/resume/curricum vita with him. His answer was No, I did not think it was needed in court. (During his testimony, it was learned that, he had never testified as a expert witness before and hence did not know he should have brought his resume with him to court.
During court testimony, under oath Villalobos admitted to engaging in "Play therapy" with the children which he admittedly failed to record. During these therapy sessions sometimes Villalobos played the abuser. "sic and twisted" When asked why the children showed animosity and hatredness towards him after each of his therapy sessions. Mr. Villalobos responded - the children were transfering their anger and hate at him. What was really their anger and hatredness towards their father. This cruel and abusive therapy was questioned in court and Villalobos was soon removed from the children's lives via a court order. What others including thrapists noticed soon after was the remarkable progress the children made in transitioning to a normal life with their father. The Children's father had gained back custody. This is what he had to say when asked. Mr. Villalobos needs to be put on the national child abuser registry. What he did in the name of therapy was dispicable, self serving, traumatic and abusive. If Mr. Villalobos has a shred of decency in him, He would seek therapy for himself for his sick perversions. Alowing this individual to be anywhere near a child is child abuse.
What seems remarkable - Even after Honorable Judge Leslie Alden discredited his testimony and ruled that the children if at all abused by anyone was by the therapy of Mr. Villalobos. He continued to convience the delusional mother of the children that the children would be helped by therapy. In 2009 Honorable Judge Maxfield in his ruling issued an order preventing Mr. Villalobos from having any further contact with the children...Amen!
. Ricardo Villalobos
Ricard Villalobos
Richardo Villalobos
52 Falls Church, VA
Takoma Park, MD
Arlington, VA
Chicago, IL
Washington, DC
More Locations
Antonio Villalobos
Raul A Villalobos
Teresa Villalobos
David Schrumpf Therapist, White Collar Child Abuser
On December 3, 2010, detectives from the Harford County Child Advocacy Center charged a Whiteford psychologist Dr. David Schrumpf with several counts of sexual abuse of a minor and sexual offenses. The investigation began when the CAC received reports of abuse from two children who were receiving therapy from him.
The alleged abuse occurred over several months during 2010 in his office in Fallston. Schrumpf, 55, is being held at the Harford County Detention Center with no bail.
Anyone from the public with further information concerning this investigation is asked to contact Trooper Michelle Workman at the Harford County Child Advocacy Center at 410-638-3294 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 410-638-3294
Continue reading on Examiner.com Harford psychologist charged with sexual child abuse - Baltimore buzz Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/buzz-in-baltimore/harford-psychologist-charged-with-sexual-child-abuse#ixzz1OyZ4Ke2i
A former professor at George Washington University has been sentenced to nearly four years in prison for possession of child pornography.
Diego Fasolini was sentenced Friday in federal court in Washington to 47 months in prison.
Court documents show Fasolini brought his computer hard drive to George Washington's computer center for a technical problem. When a university employee examined the hard drive, suspected child pornography was found. Authorities discovered that Fasolini had more than 100,000 images of child pornography.
BSO Case Number: BS10-12-4847
PIO Number: 10-12-19
Date: 12/22/10
Time: 11 a.m. Jurisdiction: Pembroke Pines
Place of Occurrence: 8770 NW 7 Ct., Pembroke Pines
A Broward County speech pathologist isn’t saying much after Broward Sheriff’s Office detectives took him into custody for possession of child pornography.
Following over a dozen tips from the National Center for Missing and Exploited children alerting of a computer user who was uploading and sharing pornographic images of children, BSO detectives with the South Florida Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force conducted an investigation and obtained a warrant to search a home in the city of Pembroke Pines.
When detectives arrived at the home at 8770 NW 7 Ct. on Dec. 22, they came in contact with their target, 66-year-old Warren Day, who at the time was on his computer viewing a child pornography website.
A preliminary evaluation of Day’s computer revealed hundreds of pornographic images of children between 1 and 12 years of age engaging in sexual acts with adults, other children and in sexually explicit positions.
Day refused to answer questions without the presence of his lawyer, but stated “I am a piece of (vulgar term for excrement)” in the presence of BSO detectives.
Day was arrested and charged with 50 counts of child pornography. More charges could be filed pending a full forensic analysis of Day’s computer and two other media devices found inside his home. He was arrested in 1982 in Dade County for committing a sexual act against a child and served two years probation. Due to the date of his offense, he was not required to register as a sexual offender.
For the past seven months Day has worked as a speech pathologist at the Hollywood Rehab Center working with seniors, but throughout his 30 year career he has come in contact with children from kindergarten to high school. He was previously employed by the Dade County School System.
Detectives have identified at least one victim and fear there could be others. If you know anyone who’s been a victim of Warren Day you’re asked to contact BSO Detective Jennifer Montgomery at 954-888-5239 or Broward Crime Stoppers, anonymously, at 954-493-TIPS (8477).
Therapist Charged with Producing Child Pornography Beth Phillips, United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, announced today that a respiratory therapist who sometimes worked in the pediatric unit at Kansas University Medical Center has been charged in federal court with producing child pornography and attempting to distribute child pornography over the Internet.
Michael D. Toal, 55, of Kansas City, Mo., was charged in a criminal complaint filed on Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2010, in the U.S. District Court in Kansas City. Toal had his initial court appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays this afternoon and remains in federal custody pending a detention hearing on Monday, March 1, 2010.
The federal criminal complaint alleges that Toal used a minor to produce child pornography on Aug. 2, 2009. According to an affidavit filed in support of the complaint, Toal told FBI agents that he sexually abused an 8-year-old child who was in his care at his house. While the victim was asleep, the affidavit says, Toal took sexually explicit photographs of the child with his digital camera and then loaded them onto his computer.
The federal complaint also charges Toal with attempting to distribute child pornography over the Internet on Aug. 10, 2009. According to the affidavit, an agent at the FBI’s Denver, Col., division conducted an investigation using peer-to-peer file-sharing software and downloaded images of child pornography that were available to be shared from Toal’s computer, which was using a similar software program.
Law enforcement officers interviewed Toal at his home earlier this month and seized his computer, which as later investigation revealed, contained a large quantity of child pornography, the affidavit says.
The government filed a motion today to keep Toal in federal custody without bond, alleging that he is a danger to the community. According to the motion for detention, Toal told agents that he inappropriately touched at least one child patient while working as a respiratory therapist. Toal has increased his access to children who are vulnerable, the motion says, by becoming a volunteer with Jackson County’s CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocate) program for abused and neglected children who are in the care and custody of the state.
The motion for detention also alleges that, because Toal faces a lengthy prison sentence if convicted, he is a flight risk. Under federal statutes, a conviction for producing child pornography carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years in federal prison without parole, up to a sentence of 30 years in federal prison without parole.
Phillips cautioned that the charges contained in this complaint are simply accusations, and not evidence of guilt. Evidence supporting the charges must be presented to a federal trial jury, whose duty is to determine guilt or innocence.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Katharine Fincham. It was investigated by task force officers with the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Project Safe Childhood
This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov.
-----------------------------------------
Va. Counselor Accused of Inappropriately Touching Patient
A counselor in Loudon County, Va., is facing sexual assault charges after being accused of inappropriately touching a patient during a counseling session, according to the Loudon County Sheriff’s Office.
Steven L. Solow, 62, is a licensed practicing counselor in Purcellville, Va.
Solow was charged with misdemeanor sexual assault Thursday after he allegedly inappropriately touched his 31-year-old female patient on June 6, the sheriff’s office said.
The sheriff’s office is asking anyone who may have been inappropriately touched by Solow to call 703-777-0475.
Counselor indicted on charges of sexual assault of 3-year-old patient
An Albuquerque clinical psychologist has been indicted on charges of rape and sexual contact of a then-3-year-old patient during a counseling appointment at Samaritan Counseling Center that occurred two years ago.
Dr. Luis Vargas, 66, was booked and released from the county jail Wednesday after a grand jury indicted him on March 13.
His attorney said late Thursday that Vargas’ patients are often troubled and prone to making false allegations.
Dr. Luis Vargas
According to a police report, officers were called to the counseling center near Lomas and University NE in June 2015 after a woman reported that her granddaughter told her the psychologist touched her bottom and her genitals and spit in her mouth.
The woman said she had taken her granddaughter to the counseling appointment, and as they were leaving the little girl shouted “marrano” (pig) at Vargas. The woman said she asked her granddaughter why she had been rude to the doctor, and the young girl made the allegations, according to the report.
The girl went to a sexual abuse medical evaluation and provided more details of a sexual assault.
When officers talked to Vargas, he said the girl “was a client for two sessions” but he wanted to talk with his attorney before being interviewed. The attorney refused to schedule an interview, according to the report.
In September 2015, the police department forwarded the case to the District Attorney’s Office for review and possible prosecution.
It’s unclear why it took a year and a half for Vargas to be charged in the case.
Former Bernalillo County District Attorney Kari Brandenburg left office in January. Christopher Moore, a prosecutor for new District Attorney Raúl Torrez, said their office felt it was important to move forward with the case.
“There’s a little girl who said she was touched,” Moore said. “If it was your child, wouldn’t you want something done?”
A spokesman for the district attorney said there was a separate allegation in 2013 involving a boy, but the case was not indicted.
Vargas’ attorney Marc Lowry said his client is a trusted clinician who treats difficult cases of child abuse and occasionally the children transfer the blame for their trauma onto him.
“The allegation made here against Dr. Vargas is the product of sad, deeply disturbed patient who has been raised in an extremely chaotic home,” Lowry said in an emailed statement Thursday.
He said the 2013 allegation was also false and made by a troubled boy with a history of making “false allegations of sexual abuse.”
The Samaritan Counseling Center did not return a phone call asking if Vargas is still employed at the center, and it’s unclear if he continued to work as a counselor after the allegation.
He is listed in the University of New Mexico directory as an emeritus associate professor in the Department of Psychology and as a psychologist for programs for children and adolescents.
A UNM spokeswoman couldn’t immediately say if he was currently teaching at the school.
Gilberto Suero, a clinical social worker and psychotherapist, is accused of abusing two girls during therapy sessions in his office on Richmond Road.(Staten Island Advance/Jan Somma-Hammel)
Gilberto Suero
STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. -- A Dongan Hills psychotherapist stands accused of sexually abusing two girls who were his patients, according to police.
Gilberto Suero, 49, who claims to be a licensed clinical social worker, was taken into police custody at his office at 1272 Richmond Road at about 5 p.m. on Friday, according to a spokeswoman for the NYPD's Deputy Commissioner of Public Information.
The girls were victimized during therapy sessions in Suero's office, according to police.
Suero is accused of touching a 12-year-old girl on her inner thigh and buttocks and attempting to kiss her on April 6.
A then 8-year-old girl was allegedly touched numerous times on the breast and buttocks underneath her clothing including in July 2014 as reported to police on May 3 of this year.
Suero is listed on various career websites as a New York State licensed clinical social worker who graduated from Adelphi University.
He faces various charges that include sexual abuse of a victim under age 13 by a person over age 21, acting in a manner injurious to a child and forcible touching.
Public records indicate that he is being held at Rikers Island and is due back in Criminal Court on Thursday.
Staten Island therapist charged with sexually abusing girls as young 8 years old
A Staten Island therapist was charged with sexually abusing a 13-year-old girl and a pair of sisters — ages 8 and 10 — and cops suspect there may be additional victims.
Court records provided a glimpse of Gilberto Suero’s alleged sick spree of perversion that landed him behind bars.
During a Dec. 23 session at his Richmond Road office in Dongan Hills, Suero sat the 10-year-old girl on his lap and kissed her on the cheek, court papers show. On the same day, the 8-year-old was also fondled. The girl told cops she was groped while she and the suspect watched videos, sources said.
The foster mother of the two younger girls contacted the Seaman Society, the organization that paid Suero to provide therapy for those girls, on May 3 to complain about the therapist. The girls’ biological father was then contacted because his permission was needed to conduct physical exams of the children.
The father, it turned out, is also a patient of Suero, sources said. In a rage, he called the suspect, who denied any wrongdoing. But during a controlled call set up by police, Suero told the foster mother that he put the 8-year-old on his lap during a movie and that he may have touched her by accident, sources said.
Police in late April learned of the 13-year-old girl, who told her mother Suero touched her during her therapy sessions. The teen, who just recently started seeing Suero to deal with self-esteem issues, said the suspect didn’t do anything wrong the first two sessions because her mother was present. The next two times she went alone. He allegedly fondled her during a session on April 6.
“You are so beautiful,” he said, according to court papers.
During the next session, on April 20, Suero tried to kiss her on the lips, sources said. She said she pulled away, but he still managed to kiss her on the nose — and tried to get her to exchange photos, according to court papers and sources.
Suero, 49, was arrested Friday and charged with felony sex abuse, plus misdemeanors for sex abuse, forcible touching and acting in a manner injurious to a child. He’s being held on $50,000 bail. His shady past includes an arrest for selling drugs, sources said Monday.
A woman neighbors identified as Suero’s wife refused to comment outside the family’s home.
“I don’t know him,” she said.
Neighbors said Suero has lived there for about seven years. “His kids play with my kids,” said a neighbor who requested anonymity. "He’s such a nice guy. It’s unbelievable.”
Seaman Society officials declined to comment, citing the ongoing investigation. The Administration for Children’s Services, which hired the agency, said it is investigating.
“We are deeply disturbed by these allegations, and are working with the NYPD to support this investigation,” an ACS spokesman said in a statement. “We are also working closely with our contract provider to identify and ensure the safety of any child with whom this individual may have been in contact.”
Suero has four arrests — three are sealed and the other dates back to 1990,
when he was charged in a Manhattan drug case, with use, sale and possession of narcotics.
“There’s a lot of kids over here, so it’s really not good,” said a woman who manages a nearby business. “I’m very surprised. You hear about stuff like this, but it’s just very close. It’s uncomfortable for me. Young children — boys or girls, I mean, you’re a grown man. It’s pretty disgusting.”
Victorville therapist accused of sexually abusing developmentally disabled patient
Gregory Harmeling, 45, a licensed marriage and family counselor, was arrested Thursday, Dec. 29, 2016, on suspicion of sexual assault involving a developmentally disabled patient in Victorville.
VICTORVILLE >> A licensed therapist is accused of sexually abusing a mentally disabled woman during one of their sessions in his Victorville office, and detectives feel more victims may be out there, officials said.
Gregory Harmeling, 45, of Victorville was arrested late Thursday morning on suspicion of sexual penetration with a foreign object and abuse of a dependent adult, San Bernardino County sheriff’s booking records show. Harmeling has since been released after posting $100,000 bail.
Investigators with the sheriff’s Victorville Station learned the victim had gone to a counseling session with Harmeling in early December at his office at 15000 Seventh St. He also has an office at 1406 Bailey Ave. in Needles, officials said.
During her second visit, Harmeling allegedly began brushing the woman’s hair and eventually began touching her in an inappropriate manner, according to a Sheriff’s Department news release.
Harmeling reportedly locked the door to his office, “pushed the victim on to her back, climbed on top of her and sexually assaulted her,” the statement read.
Investigators say Harmeling continued for several minutes despite the victim protesting the attack.
Detectives were able to gather information supporting the allegations made by the victim, according to authorities. Detectives believe other victims may exist.
His profile page on Psychology Today lists Harmeling’s areas of expertise: “I specialize in working with groups such as the LGBT youth and adults, victims of crime, and foster care children and adolescents.”
Anyone with information about this investigation can call Detective Dana Weinberg of the Victorville Station at 760-243-1989. Callers wishing to remain anonymous can call the We-Tip Hotline at 1-800-78CRIME (27463), or can leave information on the We-Tip website at www.wetip.com.
I contended that serious crimes have been committed, In Fairfax County Courts and that the evidence backing my claims of judge shopping, false swearing, fabrication of “evidence,” perjured testimony (over and again), subornation of perjury and cover-up thereof is ironclad and well-documented. The only thing that was not clear was whether anyone in the Virginia Legislature or otherwise in authority will have the nerve to pursue a matter in which Fairfax County judges, prosecuting attorney(s) and a police officer are the ones being accused of committing felonies.
AFFIDAVIT OF ELIZABETH J. PAWLAK OPPOSING CERTIFICATION FOR RE-APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES MICHAEL J. CASSIDY AND DENNIS SMITH (FAIRFAX COUNTY) Read the whole affidavit here.
3. In a justice system that heavily relies on the integrity of police, prosecutors and judges, the re-appointment of Judges Michael J. Cassidy and Dennis Smith (Fairfax County) who colluded (or conspired) with the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office for Fairfax County to cover up serious crimes on the part of the Fairfax County police officer and the Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney will send a terrifying message that official lawlessness may be above the law. Accordingly, I request that the certifications of Judges Michael J. Cassidy and Dennis Smith be temporarily withheld pending more complete investigation. 4. On December 10, 2010, I testified about two inextricably-intertwined proceedings: one before Judge Cassidy of the General District Court(Cases Nos. GT08258169-00 and GT08258170-00 ), and one before a series of judges of the Fairfax County Circuit Court (Cases Nos. MI 2009-321 and MI 2009-322). I contended that serious crimes have been committed, and that the evidence backing my claims of judge shopping, false swearing, fabrication of “evidence,” perjured testimony (over and again), subornation of perjury and cover-up thereof is ironclad and well-documented. The only thing that was not clear was whether anyone in the Virginia Legislature or otherwise in authority will have the nerve to pursue a matter in which Fairfax County judges, prosecuting attorney(s) and a police officer are the ones being accused of committing felonies. The individuals in question have engaged in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the court by manipulating established court procedures so as to accomplish their personally desired result(s). Moreover, a criminal justice system in which the prosecutor alone is able to select the judge of his choice to preside at trial so that this judge will be his agent or henchman (as it is the case here) raises serious concerns about the appearance of partiality and serious questions about the confidence in the judicial integrity of our courts and the obvious prejudice that such actions have on the public confidence in the judiciary. 5. My claims of judge shopping, false swearing, fabrication of “evidence,” perjured testimony (over and again), subornation of perjury and cover-up were reduced by Delegates Janis, Athey and Gilbert to discretionary rulings regarding “facts” and “no judge shopping” in order to deflect the attention from the true issues that have nothing to do with either any “facts” or unfettered judicial discretion. While a court has jurisdiction and discretion to err and the remedy to correct an error by a trial court is to appeal the court's decision upon entry of a final order, no trial court has jurisdiction to render the order based on an invalid indictment (or warrant or summons) -such orders STATEMENT OF GEORGE E. MCDERMOTT IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF HIS DECEMBER 10, 2010 TESTIMONY AGAINST RE-APPOINTMENT OF JUDGE CASSIDY OF THE FAIRFAX COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT COURT
1. I am over the age of eighteen and am competent to testify in the matter herein. 2. My name is Elizabeth J. Pawlak. I received my legal education at Georgetown University Law Center (JD ’92). I practice patent law before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. My additional educational and professional credentials are recited at Dr. Elizabeth J. Pawlak, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that:
I met Suzie#0 when she was separated, having escaped to a friend's apartment with her minor son. Her then spouse had so terrified the people where she was staying that they had purchased a gun, a .357 magnum if I remember correctly. This spouse would stalk their residence, accost his Suzie#0 when she tried to obtain work and numerous times threatened to kill her, the minor son and the daughter if she did not return. Once when she sought shelter at the Woman's Shelter he threatened them with all sorts of harm. I kept trying to talk Suzie#0 into getting back together with her family - that is until I listened over the phone to one of his rants, from preaching to threatening. Then one time the husband was returning the minor son from a visitation, while holding the child he started yelling at Suzie#0, the lady that was providing shelter for her asked for the child so that the kid would not be exposed to the argument. During this altercation I was hiding in a stairwell with the lady's boyfriend, it was at this time that he showed me the gun they had purchased because of this guy. This "father" then took the child and threw him at the lady, knocking her flat on her back. Suzie#0 was not safe, neither was the woman and the family that sheltered her, the husband stalked and assaulted Suzie#0 at mass transit stops and at the various jobs she obtained. She would obtain employment, the courts would demand the address that they would provide to her spouses attorney and within a week the spouse would be accosting her at the new job. Employers do not look favorably on new employees or their relations causing a disturbance around customers. Less than a week before a custody hearing the husband took the minor child and did not return them, Suzie#0 had proof that she had custody (Social Services support and waiting list for residence), at the time of the hearing she was between attorneys having lost her first two - the courts did not accept the loss of an attorney as a reason for a delay so she lost custody of her minor son. Even though the judge awarded her liberal visitation, the husband would use the contact to berate and threaten her, the child was not allowed out of the townhouse either, Suzie#0 never got a visitation. I figured that given the situation Suzie#0 could vanish, at least the assaults would be stopped so I let her move in, this did not last. I found Suzie#0 knocked out on the patio, evidently she had gone outside for a cigarette when her husband knocked her out, giving her two black eyes, I/we had also observed him stalking around the residence, like he did the woman's residence, numerous times my neighbors, Suzie#0's co-workers had to intervene. Apparently the daughter had given up our address, she was upset because Suzie#0 had left her behind, which had been her choice but as a result the "father" had turned his attentions to the daughter. The police did nothing about the situation, they classified it as a domestic dispute, personally I believe that they were attracted to this "husband" since he had taken to wearing Suzie#0's' clothes and started hormone treatments to change his gender. It was coming up on six months and Suzie#0 had not had a visitation, she requested one the proscribed period dictated by the courts and the spouse said he would allow it The day before the visitation the spouse again vacillated between preaching, threatening and screaming over the phone, this went on for two hours Suzie#0 was reduced to tears, begging to talk to the child. Fed up I made the mistake of calling the Ex up and provide incentive to stop his stalking and assaults - my incentives worked but resulted in the Civil Suit and cost Suzie#0 her visitation (no I did not threaten but did employ some psychological tactics to dissuade physical attacks). With all this going on I found it ironic that this individual had the support of the Virginia Courts and The Church of God , not only was he threatening, members of The Church of God would come around preaching. I knew this individual as an abusive, violent, cross-dressing, hormone taking, incestuous individual that was being protected by the Police, Courts and a "Christian" Church - against an abused woman with a learning disability. This still confuses me, but they say that "Birds of a Feather Flock together" and we have stood up to all these freaks.
Suzie#0 had tried to get family counseling from Social Services, her husband had threatened them with violence for interfering with his family. Suzie#0 continued to seek counseling, for three years she saw TheRestonCounselor#0 before her separation. It got to the point that TheRestonCounselor#0 recommended that Suzie#0 leave. So after three years of counseling Suzie#0 finally decided to leave, Suzie#0 packed up her minor child, left a note, called the police to escort and document the separation. Suzie#0 left the residence with her minor son, moving in with Florence#0 and her family. Suzie#0 continued to see TheRestonCounselor#0 for a couple of years after the separation. During this period Husband#0 continued to threaten, stalk and assault Suzie#0, he terrorized Florence#0's residence and disrupted what employment Suzie#0 obtained.
We are not aware of Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. never contacting Social Services. Suzie#0 even has a letter from Social Services to Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. offering their assistance, yet Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. never bothered, ignoring years of professional counseling and support. ATTORNEY#06 would bring in church and family members all commenting to the courts what a sinner Suzie#0 was. Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. would show up, when Suzie#0 got upset because ATTORNEY#06 would lie and Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. would ignore it with a comment like "professional curtesy". Did Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. present an adequate defense to the courts ? Did the courts ignore Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. ? Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. did file a "Rule to Show Cause" but this action was dismissed by the judge with "Court will not enter 'Rule to Show Cause' when the petition is sworn by attorney rather than party. Also insufficient time - return date 3/20" notation on the document retrieved from the archives. Just what does this mean ? Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. was theoretically acting on behalf of their client (party) - yet this judge dismisses it.
One day Suzie#0 received a call from TheRestonCounselor#0 from social services who was trying to help her survive the relationship, they informed her that there was a sheriff at her office with court orders to produce her records and notes on Suzie#0's session. This was very upsetting in that TheRestonCounselor#0 was the only other person Suzie#0 thought she could trust, so in the sessions they would discuss what was going on and how to deal with the events. Suzie#0 does not know whether the courts notified her attorney (Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr.) and he did not bother to tell her or the courts did not believe that they had to obey the Privacy Act of 1977 and notify the individual prior to accessing confidential records in an ongoing case. Given that the records started around three years prior to the separation and continued on to two years past it, it appeared that the access was "legal".
Suzie#0 contacted her attorney at the time that the courts accessed her mental health records and demanded that Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. do something to stop the access, after prompting he took action. Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. he filed a "Motion to Quash", the motion was dismissed by the courts and the record access allowed. Years later we went to Fairfax County Archives and looked up the records, scanning the files we found a document, the "Motion to Quash". Judge H L. Thomas presided over Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr.'s Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum ruled made the following note on the document found in the archives - "Motion to Quash denied Def. entitled to psychiatric records from 1-1-90.". This notation would exclude three years of records documenting the state of the household before the separation. The notation also excluded a year of documentation after the separation of stalking, threats and assaults. I had made my phone tape which stopped any meaningful event in the years that followed, so the records accessed only had documentation of the stress and strategy that Suzie#0 had in fighting the legal battles. Suzie#0 was trying to survive the stress of losing and worrying about her son, obtain employment, another Husband#0 assault and surviving ATTORNEY#06's crusade at this time. We do not know if Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. noted this exclusion, presented the fact, but he was dismissed by the courts selective alteration of the context of the evidence by allowing information that was irrelevant to the divorce proceedings. The documentation obtained would show a woman under stress, without visible cause and would allow the courts to make a prejudicial ruling on the divorce.
The contents of the court omitted records included documentation of discussions with TheRestonCounselor#0 addressing a variety of relationship issues. Suzie#0 had tried to deal with the suicide of her sister who had killed herself after Husband#0 took the phone from Suzie#0 and hit her. Suzie#0 had also discussed the time when her husband, Husband#0, had handcuffed her to the bed, poured Jack Daniels down her throat, injected her with a drug and allowed his three friends to have her. Friends being allowed to discipline both the daughter and minor son. Lastly Husband#0 announcing his intent to become a woman, followed up with doctors bills and the discovery of pictures of Husband#0 in drag and self mutilation. This documentation was a small part of the information that the courts chose not to include with Judge H L. Thomas's ommission. Why didnt Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. include and review all the records ? Why didnt Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. use the willing TheRestonCounselor#0 to refute the parade of church and family members that ATTORNEY#06 paraded through the courts ? Why did Judge H L. Thomas, the courts, specifically exclude four years of records that would document the state of the marriage by professionals ?
I find it fascinating how the "authorities" avoid responsibility for their negligence. Take this situation here the courts ruled against Suzie#0, ruling that she have no contact with her minor son, Suzie#0 still has proof of an abusive household - the mental health records covering the period leading up to and after the separation, why cant the children sue Fairfax County for the damage that it caused - the son's untreated now chronic medical problems and the daughters molestation. The county in its actions facilitated this outcome, the human excuse is irrelevant in this and all such governmental screw ups, I say this because unlike one individual that may be sick or make a poor judgment call, these institutions are supposed to have levels of management whose professional reason for existing is to ensure that their staff successfully completes their mission. When the courts sided with an abuser and alleged molester by denying Suzie#0 contact with her minor son it became their responsibility to ensure the safety and well being of the children. Did they do this ? Did they protect the daughter from Husband#0's attentions ? The minor son, now grown up has chronic medical problems because of this negligence.
Husband#0 was awarded the divorce by the courts based upon Suzie#0's infidelity. Suzie#0 was awarded half the common property, which was the townhouse for seventeen years of marital abuse. This was not good enough for the husband or his crusading attorney, in the first place the townhouse was nearly paid off, an appraisal and refinance would have settled this issue. So the courts ordered the sale of the property, everyone agreed on a real-estate agent to sell it and things were moving again. However in each case the Ex messed up the showings - then lied in court about scheduled appointments with the agent. In the meantime the Ex's attorney was demanding child support from a woman that did not have a job and no settlement. The courts approximated a salary for Suzie#0 and demanded child support, I point out that the Ex had been stalking her at all her places of employment, including after our move to Manassas, these scenes had cost her employment. So Suzie#0 went to jail for non-payment of child support. This was when Attorney#03 deserted her, failing to even visit her in jail. Luckily one of our neighbors worked in the Fairfax jail, so we managed to keep Suzie#0 safe while she was there. Suzie#0 found Attorney#04 and this attorney extracted her from the jail. All this ate up Suzie#0's share of the settlement from the townhouse that Ms. Judy A. Dugger forced to auction. This ruling by the courts did not help Suzie#0 get started, get her clothes that the EX wore, or be able to afford transportation - the good thing is that Suzie#0 is still alive.
When Suzie#0 left the husband cancelled both her's and his daughters coverage under his "Health Care" - not a big issue if he had allowed his wife to obtain employment and get covered.
This divorce was the most upsetting situation that I observed. I personally witnessed her husband assault the woman that was putting her up, using his own child and in the process knocking the woman down, the daily phone threats several of which I listened into as he would alternate between threatening his family and preaching. Then there was the husband's intent to become a woman, this may be acceptable to some but Suzie#0 did not want to be married to a woman, she found it an unacceptable relationship. According to documented Virginia law so far a woman cannot be married to a woman. The courts accepted claims that it was a fetish, and did not accept that Suzie#0 did not find the behavior acceptable - Suzie#0 had the doctors receipt and hormone prescription at one time, this was another item that her counsel chose not to present to the courts. The husbands attorney managed to get the courts to release Suzie#0's mental health records starting a year after separation, not those records that covered the period before the separation or the year after it - the husbands attorney acquired the confidential treatment of a woman in a stressful situation confiding in their counselor for a solution, it is to be noted that part of the stress was because the retained attorneys kept failing to address supporting issues. In one incident of abuse the husband and three of his friends had tied up Suzie#0 pouring Jack Daniels down her throat and injected her with something as the husband watched his friends rape her. Another unacceptable event was when he informed Suzie#0 that he planned to change into a woman, this was done by calling Suzie#0 up at a church event to inform her of his intent, in his zest to see how he looked as a woman he ruined Suzie#0's property, her clothes by wearing them in the process stretching them so they no longer fit. When the Suzie#0 finally left the household she had little or no property and her minor son, no money either. Now when she tried to get a divorce, these "authorities" judged her the sinner and left her with nothing, the minor son that she had run away with was ignored after the court case was over, the child apparently because of lack of treatment has several chronic medical problems that will be with them for the rest of their lives. Also because of these "authorities" judgments Suzie#0 could not help the estranged daughter who claimed to me that after Suzie#0 had left, the husband had turned his attentions to her. What I observe here is that these "authorities" play lip service to the written law yet choose to overlook portions when it suits them, from their actions and failures to act it appears that they condone and facilitate an environment of abuse, rape, sexual deviations and lies. I say this because if they did not condone / facilitate such an environment there would be a means to redress the failures of this system. It upsets me when a client hires someone to do a job, the client presents these attorneys with materials, they disregard them and as a result their client gets "fucked" the people that support this implementation sicken me with their hypocrisy. Note I say "implementation" because if in Suzie#0's case the Judge and the attorneys had done their job a fair resolution would have occurred the System would have worked both parties would have been able to continue with their lives and the child would have been taken care of. But a Judge that does not listen, an attorney that lies in their crusade and other attorneys that just overlook meaningful EVENTDETAILS are not implementing the system correctly. Again I find it festinating that this court institution condones and supports lies from its "officers", Suzie#0 / this abusers wife had documents and professional witnesses (therapists) predating the separation, she even called the police to aid in her vacating the household - yet the abusing husband's attorney kept repeating that the woman deserted, lied about custody of the minor, lied about the assaults and claimed coincidence for his appearances. Then the courts conspired with the attorney to access confidential mental health records that dated a year after the separation (the period noted by someone called Judge H L. Thomas that exclusively omitted the separation and the period before it), this information was used to prove that Suzie#0 was unfaithful (a year after her separation) but otherwise it was irrelevant to the case. Why did this Judge H L. Thomas individual exclude the separation, slanting the presented information, only accessing the documentation of woman under stress living in fear that maybe she would not be so lucky the next time she is assaulted - excluding documentation of a history of abuse in this manner the system is bypassed by implementation and "due process" is corrupted.
Anomalies - A fair court - or - Kangaroo court 01 Why didn't the courts notify Suzie#0 prior to the access of her confidential mental health records ? It took TheRestonCounselor#0 calling Suzie#0 up to tell her of the access. 02 Suzie#0 had believed that all her records had been accessed when she tried to have Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. quash the access to her medical records after her counselor notified her of the breach. It was not until we went to the archives that we observed that the courts had limited the access to a period that did not pertain to the divorce, starting a year after the separation - why was this ? Was this a conspiracy by the courts with a crusading attorney out to squash escaping chattel ? By this omission the courts broke their own law pertaining to the access of confidential records at that time - the access had to address the "need to know requirement" in this case cover the period prior to and including the separation not the musings of a woman under stress. The reason that this is so pivotal is that Suzie#0 had discussed legal strategies and issues of emotional stress with these mental health counselors with the belief that the conversations were confidential - they had been with her much longer than I had. 03 Why did the courts disregard the stalking as coincidence ? especially when said coincidence resulted in numerous situations ? 04 Why didn't the courts accept the abuse, gender transformation and wearing of Suzie#0's clothes by her husband as suitable reasons for divorce ? Is this a reflection of those implementing the courts ? 05 With all that happened, why did it take Suzie#0 admitting infidelity nearly three years after separation for the courts to award the husband with the divorce and allow her to escape this individual ? 06 Why did the courts keep accepting the husbands delays ? Mr. A. Strode Brent Jr. cited "professional curtesy" as his excuse for failing. Reasons that Suzie#0 told me for separating and divorcing Husband#0. R1 When I met Suzie#0 the last thing I wanted to do was to break up a household if it could be put together that would be best. So I asked and asked and asked her why she wanted to leave the household what follows were the reasons that she told me and supporting information was available for the courts. Reason 1 First reason that Suzie#0 gave me for wanting a divorce was that her husband was wearing her clothes and had informed her that he was taking the hormones to become a woman. Suzie#0 has nothing against gender benders as long as they do not impact her life, this activity combined with his making her clothes unwearable was the straw that broke the camels back. Apparently this does not constitute a reason for divorce in the eyes of Virginia Courts or The Church of God . Reason 2 Second reason that Suzie#0 gave me for wanting a divorce was to extract herself and her children from an abusive relationship. An example being when the husband had prevented her from obtaining a drivers license and beat her when she visited friends. Another one was when Suzie#0's sister committed suicide, she had been on the phone with her sister that night but her husband took the phone from her and hit her. Reason 3 Third reason that Suzie#0 gave me for wanting a divorce. The husband had handcuffed her to their bed, poured Jack Daniels down her throat, injected her with some drug and let three of his friends have their way with her. Reason 4 Fourth reason that Suzie#0 gave me for wanting a divorce. The husbands friends were disciplining the children, she commented that one of his friends held her daughters hands over the stove. Reason 5 Fifth reason that Suzie#0 gave me for wanting a divorce. Her husband had committed adultery with someone in Pennsylvania where he had an illegitimate child. Reason 6 Sixth reason that Suzie#0 gave me for wanting a divorce. One other thing that I have heard was that her husband had been convicted of Felony Rape. I have been told that he raped a thirteen year old and spent a year and half in jail for it. This supports our concern when Suzie#0's daughter claimed that he had made advances towards his daughter when Suzie#0 left. Reason 7 Seventh reason that Suzie#0 gave me was that when Suzie#0 tried to get a drivers license and Husband#0 found out he would beat her. Reason 8 Husband#0 denied Suzie#0 contact with her already estranged family and also denied her contact with her foster families. Usually beating her when contact was made, there were not any strong family bonds that could have removed her from this abuse.
Next - A Fairfax Court Story - Family Values (II) Contact/Donations
Who is this ? Me#0 Veteran U.S. Marine, programmer - I was tasered by the police so I am now a "threat to society". Suzie#0 Abused, discriminated against - diagnosed bipolar disorder, slight reading problem, great cook and a little gullible. Gumby#0 Judge/Magistrate - isolated the mental health record access, omitting the period that was relevant to the divorce case (identified by note of exclusion). Thomas, H L
Florence#0 Friend that provided sanctuary for Suzie#0, the woman who the "Christian" husband knocked down by throwing his child at her. JUDGE#0 Judge that only heard one side, making his judgement Valentine,
TheRestonCounselor#0 Suzie#0's Reston Social Services Northwest Center Mental Health Counselor ATTORNEY#03 Third Attorney (divorce) - Just did not use what was available, even after ATTORNEY#06 use it out context against Suzie#0 Brent Jr., A. Strode The Law Firm of Whitestone, Brent, Young & Merril, P.C. Fairfax Virginia ATTORNEY#01 First Attorney Halago, Alveine G Suzie#0's former foster mother's attorney connected Suzie#0 with this attorney
ATTORNEY#02 Second Attorney, defended me on the phone tapes that stopped Husband#0's stalking by using evidence that Suzie#0 had from her divorce. Mason Referred by ATTORNEY#01
ATTORNEY#04 Fourth Attorney (divorce) - Got Suzie#0 out of jail, fought through the mistakes of ATTORNEY#03 and then forgot about us on an "Abuse of Process" - (an opportunity for recovery). Dugger, Judy A. Fairfax Virginia ATTORNEY#06 Husband#0's Attorney (divorce) - a member of the "TheChurch#0" / "ChurchOrg#0", on a crusade against abused, escaping chattel. I nearly published this woman hating monster's name but he crusades against women, perpetuating and supporting spousal abuse. TheChurch#0 Judged Suzie#0 a sinner (Judge not lest ye be judged), harrassed and supported an abuser, a man that wanted to be a woman, against Suzie#0. Their counselor, accepted by the courts, started by calling her an adulterer, forgetting about Husband#0's "sins". The Church of God
Related / Cascading events ATTORNEY#01 & ATTORNEY#02 (1989-1990 Quitters) ATTORNEY#03 (1990-1992 Third attorney, Omitted - mental health counselors, records, police reports and did not contest lies) ATTORNEY#04 (1993-1995 Helped, promised to address "Abuse of Process" and forgot) ATTORNEY#06 (1989-1995 "ChurchOrg#0" attorney on a Crusade against abused chattel trying to escape their abuser.) ATTORNEY#07 (1995 Bankruptcy executor claimed that ATTORNEY#03 did their job) A Fairfax Court Story - Family Values (III) (1989-1990 How Fairfax Authorities protect the children - Right) A Prince William County Court Story - Family Values (IV) (1989-1995 Ex's Civil Suit - Intentional Infliction of Emotional distress) A Alexandria Court Story - Family Values (V) (1995 Suzie#0's bankruptcy - Escapes the Civil Suit) TheChurch#0 and ChurchOrg#0 (Judge not lest ye be Judged - home of the Attorney on a "Crusade") A Negligent Institution (1989-2006 Why I focus on this institution) Time Line (Way too much time wasted because of "professional failures".)
